follow-up: #3622067 A venue package carries only the layout, so a hall moved between sites arrives with its configurations and its pinnings to rebuild by hand

The bundled example was a version 3 package of a hall opened one way: no configurations, no pinnings, and no outlines on its areas. It is now an export of the real Auditorium as it stands, at manifest version 5.

What it carries now. 1422 places across 17 sections, every section with the outline its area is clicked by when it is sold by quantity, two ways of opening the hall (complete, which deviates nowhere, and reduced, which deviates in 11 areas), and the standard pinning holding 231 seats under three allotments. So importing it gives a room that can be opened and sold two ways, with a plan of who its seats are held for, without configuring anything.

Fully English, because the example is what an evaluator reads first. The hall's own data was half translated: cat1 and cat2 were "Category 1" and "Category 2" while cat3, cat4 and surjauge were still French, and all 17 sections and the artwork's own labels were French. The keys are untouched, since a key is an identifier: cour_1er_balcon stays cour_1er_balcon and is now labelled "First balcony right", parterre is "Stalls", choeur is "Choir", corbeille is "Dress circle", surjauge is "Overflow". The six divided areas name their parts for the first time ("Main" and "Side"), which is what the subsection names field exists for, and the SVG's sixteen drawn labels are English too, so nothing in the package is French any more.

One test defect this exposed, and it was the guard's own. testTheBundledExampleIsNumberedAlongItsRows grouped rows by area and row alone. This hall has six areas divided in two, each part numbering its own seats from 1, so the two halves of cour_1er_balcon row A landed on the same array keys: half the seats were dropped by the collision and what survived was checked as though it were one sweep, which reported a hall numbered against its own map. drush yoyaku:venue-positions 2 says 0 renumbered in every row, so the hall was right and the test was wrong. Keyed by area, part and row it passes, and the class went from 691 to 718 assertions, which is the point: the correction added checks rather than relaxing any.

And the example is now asserted for what it carries, not only for its geometry: the configuration, allotment, pinning and held-place counts, and that complete says nothing per area while reduced says eleven things. An export that carried the layout alone would otherwise replace this file and still look complete.

AI-Generated: Yes (Claude Code was used to export the hall, translate its labels and the artwork, write the assertions and this description, and to find the grouping defect in the numbering test. I reviewed the diff and ran the tests and every linter myself before posting.)