Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
L
linkchecker-3247797
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Custom issue tracker
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Model registry
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Issue forks
linkchecker-3247797
Commits
fbb42a55
Commit
fbb42a55
authored
12 years ago
by
Alexander Hass
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
linkchecker_update_6211 was missing an update message.
parent
03c64a0b
No related branches found
No related tags found
Loading
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
CHANGELOG.txt
+1
-0
1 addition, 0 deletions
CHANGELOG.txt
linkchecker.install
+1
-0
1 addition, 0 deletions
linkchecker.install
with
2 additions
and
0 deletions
CHANGELOG.txt
+
1
−
0
View file @
fbb42a55
linkchecker 6.x-dev, nightly
----------------------------
* linkchecker_update_6211 was missing an update message.
* #1869924: Strict warning: Creating default object from empty value.
* #1867460: Prevent save on automatic updates, if content has not changed.
* #1804842 follow up: Exit if all node types are disabled
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
linkchecker.install
+
1
−
0
View file @
fbb42a55
...
...
@@ -555,6 +555,7 @@ function linkchecker_update_6211() {
$ret
=
array
();
variable_del
(
'linkchecker_pathfilter_support'
);
$ret
[]
=
array
(
'success'
=>
TRUE
,
'query'
=>
'Removed obsolete linkchecker_pathfilter_support variable.'
);
return
$ret
;
}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment