QA Meeting - 11th February 2026
>>> [!note] Migrated issue
<!-- Drupal.org comment -->
<!-- Migrated from issue #3572872. -->
Reported by: [maddyt](https://www.drupal.org/user/3843187)
>>>
<p><strong>Update Summary: </strong> QA Weekly Meeting 11th February<br>
<strong>Check-in Date: </strong>02/11/2026<br>
<strong>Additional Collaborators: </strong> Zoocha<br>
<em>Metadata is used by the <a href="https://www.drupalstarforge.ai/" title="AI Tracker">AI Tracker.</a> Docs and additional fields <a href="https://www.drupalstarforge.ai/ai-dashboard/docs" title="AI Issue Tracker Documentation">here</a>.</em><br>
[/Tracker]</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>This ticket summarises key decisions and next steps for the Drupal Pod AI QA project as it moves toward wider community visibility.</p>
<hr>
<p><strong>Decisions</strong></p>
<p><em>Aligned</em></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Default Version Compatibility</strong><br> Drupal Pod will default to the latest <em>compatible</em> combination of CMS/core and AI modules when no version is specified, reducing build failures and improving first-time user experience. </li>
<li> <strong>Consult Drupal Forge Before Launch</strong><br> A discussion with Drupal Forge will take place prior to community promotion due to expected increases in resource usage. </li>
<li> <strong>AI Agent Compatibility Bug</strong><br> A bug ticket will be logged to address version compatibility issues affecting AI agents. </li>
<li> <strong>Project Maintenance</strong><br> Maintainer permissions have been updated to support ongoing development and administration. </li>
</ul>
<p><em>Needs Further Discussion</em></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>QA Ticket Structure</strong><br> A proposed structure for automated tests, regression checks, and standard QA has been drafted. Guidance is needed on how QA-generated improvements should be managed within the backlog. </li>
</ul>
<hr>
<p><strong>Key Points</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Documentation</strong><br> Initial documentation has been tested successfully. Documentation should live on the project page and align with main AI initiative guidance. </li>
<li> <strong>Version Handling Improvements</strong><br> The system currently pulls the latest CMS version by default, which can cause incompatibility with certain AI agent versions. A small update will ensure compatible versions are selected automatically when unspecified. Clearer feedback for failed builds is also desirable. </li>
<li> <strong>QA Structure (Draft)</strong>
<ul>
<li>Main ticket for Automated Test Candidates (with subtasks).</li>
<li>Separate tickets for Module Updates / Regression Checks.</li>
<li>Defined approach for Standard QA on in-progress work.</li>
</ul>
<p> Further clarification is needed on when new tickets should be created versus keeping findings within the originating QA issue. </p></li>
<li> <strong>Upcoming Work</strong>
<ul>
<li>Create tickets for auto-populating keys and environment auto-expiry.</li>
<li>Log and track existing bugs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<p><strong>Next Steps</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Update and create required feature and bug tickets.</li>
<li>Log the AI agent compatibility issue.</li>
<li>Share and review the proposed QA ticket structure and confirm backlog handling approach.</li>
<li>Organise a call with Drupal Forge prior to launch.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<p><strong>Overall Direction</strong></p>
<p>The tool is considered useful and close to ready for broader exposure. Immediate priorities are stabilising version defaults, clarifying documentation, and aligning on QA backlog management before public launch.</p>
issue