[Discuss] Consider context validation approach
>>> [!note] Migrated issue <!-- Drupal.org comment --> <!-- Migrated from issue #3570657. --> Reported by: [kristen pol](https://www.drupal.org/user/8389) >>> <p>[Tracker]<br> <strong>Update Summary: </strong>[One-line status update for stakeholders]<br> <strong>Check-in Date: </strong>MM/DD/YYYY<br> <strong>Blocked by: </strong>[#XXXXXX] (New issues on new lines)<br> <strong>Additional Collaborators: </strong> @username1, @username2<br> <em>Metadata is used by the <a href="https://www.drupalstarforge.ai/" title="AI Tracker">AI Tracker.</a> Docs and additional fields <a href="https://www.drupalstarforge.ai/ai-dashboard/docs" title="AI Issue Tracker Documentation">here</a>.</em><br> [/Tracker]</p> <h3 id="summary-problem-motivation">Problem/Motivation</h3> <p>Context may have issues in it such as spelling errors, duplication, factual errors.</p> <p>Consider a validation plugin system or similar to check context.</p> <h3 id="summary-proposed-resolution">Proposed resolution</h3> <p>Discuss and write up notes</p> <h3 id="summary-remaining-tasks">Target date or deadline</h3> <p>February 2026</p> <h3 id="summary-remaining-tasks">Remaining tasks</h3> <ul> <li>Discuss and capture notes</li> <li>Create follow-up issues as needed</li> </ul>
issue