>>> [!note] Migrated issue <!-- Drupal.org comment --> <!-- Migrated from issue #3567803. --> Reported by: [kristen pol](https://www.drupal.org/user/8389) >>> <p>[Tracker]<br> <strong>Update Summary: </strong>[One-line status update for stakeholders]<br> <strong>Check-in Date: </strong>MM/DD/YYYY<br> <strong>Blocked by: </strong>[#XXXXXX] (New issues on new lines)<br> <strong>Additional Collaborators: </strong> @username1, @username2<br> <em>Metadata is used by the <a href="https://www.drupalstarforge.ai/" title="AI Tracker">AI Tracker.</a> Docs and additional fields <a href="https://www.drupalstarforge.ai/ai-dashboard/docs" title="AI Issue Tracker Documentation">here</a>.</em><br> [/Tracker]</p> <h3 id="summary-problem-motivation">Problem/Motivation</h3> <p>The Usage data issue is meant to be a simple way to track what context is used for what entities:</p> <p><span class="drupalorg-gitlab-issue-link project-issue-status-info project-issue-status-7"><a href="https://www.drupal.org/project/ai_context/issues/3550034" title="Status: Closed (fixed)">#3550034: Add AI context item usage data and page</a></span></p> <p>so that we know what entities might need to be updated if context changes.</p> <p>But there's the whole audit trail aspect that Observability should help us solve.</p> <h3 id="summary-proposed-resolution">Proposed resolution</h3> <p>Discuss how Observability can be used with CCC and how that maps to tracking Usage.</p> <h3 id="summary-remaining-tasks">Target date or deadline</h3> <p>Feb 2026</p> <p>Note that it's not expected that Observability support will make it into the 1.0 release at the end of February unless we have a lightweight approach that can be added easily</p> <h3 id="summary-remaining-tasks">Remaining tasks</h3> <ul> <li>Discuss</li> <li>Create follow up issues</li> </ul> <h3 id="summary-ai-usage">AI usage</h3> <p>The code associated with this issue was developed using AI tools.</p> <p>A human worked with the AI tool to:</p> <ul> <li>Clarify the requirements</li> <li>Spec out the plan and architecture</li> <li>Create the code</li> </ul> <p>The human:</p> <ul> <li>Reviewed the code</li> <li>Manually tested the functionality</li> <li>Requested adjustments from AI</li> <li>Adjust the code themselves when necessary</li> </ul> <p>Issue credit is still relevant for humans working with AI as they are using AI as a tool and not to do everything for them. It requires human expertise and oversight to utilize AI effectively and efficiently in addressing these issues.</p> > Related issue: [Issue #3535260](https://www.drupal.org/node/3535260)